Should the NFL Shorten the Preseason?

[Sora]

With injuries becoming a concern, many suggest reducing preseason games. Would fewer games hurt player readiness or protect them from unnecessary risks? Let’s talk about the pros and cons of shortening the NFL preseason schedule.

[Theodor]

preseason is a crucial time for evaluating players, especially undrafted free agents and those on the bubble. Shortening it could make it harder for teams to make informed decisions about their rosters.

[Sim-One]

I think the NFL should consider shortening the preseason. With 17 regular-season games, the preseason feels a bit redundant. Players are already at risk of injury during those games, and many starters don’t play much anyway. Reducing the preseason would not only help avoid unnecessary injuries but also give teams more time to fine-tune their regular-season preparations.

[Jordan]

I think the NFL should shorten the preseason. Three games feel sufficient for evaluating talent without risking unnecessary injuries to key players. The league already expanded the regular season to 17 games, so reducing preseason wear and tear makes sense. Joint practices now provide valuable reps without excessive game risk